Special Topics Paper Summary
The
overall topic of my paper was the National Book Awards. One topic covered in my paper was
controversies and criticisms regarding the National Book Awards. The only
specific controversy regarding a winner that I found much information about was
the 1962 winner in the fiction category: The
Moviegoer by Walker Percy (Hedin, 2012).
Catch-22 by Joseph Heller was thought
likely to win the prize that year, and Percy’s win was met with controversy
regarding whether there had been some unethical behavior in the judging process
(which the judge in question denied and her story was corroborated by a fellow
judge) (Hedin, 2012). I also discussed
that the National Book Awards have been criticized for choosing “little-known
or obscure books” (Bosman, 2013, p. A23), which is something
that readers’ advisory librarians could be aware of in regard to these awards that patrons may see as
either a negative or positive thing depending on their preferences.
Additionally,
in my paper I discussed one former judge’s suggestion that the judging process
would be fairer if judges did not know the identities of the authors or
publishers of the works they were reading during the selection process (Lipman,
2009, p. 52).
Another criticism of the awards I discussed in my paper (from a 2002 article) is the money that
publishers had to pay to the National Book Foundation for marketing books of
theirs that got shortlisted, due to the burden it placed on small publishers
who may have a hard time affording it; however, it appears that some changes
made by the National Book Foundation since the publishing of the article I had
found criticizing that issue in 2002 should have helped to alleviate it (Zeitchik,
2002, p. 16) (Deadlines
& Guidelines, n.d.).
Another
topic covered in my paper was positive assessments of the National Book Awards.
The National Book Awards have received some positive assessments in the past few
years in regard to diversity and inclusion (Hoffert, 2018) (Grady, 2019). For example,
Constance Grady noted that in 2019 a large portion of finalists were “women,
people of color, and disabled people” (Grady, 2019).
I
also discussed in my paper that a new award category, Translated Literature, was
just added in 2018 and that that award recognizes both the author and the
translator(s) of the book (Maher, 2018, p. 15).
Works Cited
Bosman, J. (2013, November 21). 'Good Lord Bird' Is
Surprise Winner For National Book Award in Fiction. New York Times, 163(56327),
A23. Retrieved from
https://go-gale-com.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=News&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=MultiTab&searchType=AdvancedSearchForm¤tPosition=1&docId=GALE%7CA349816188&docType=Article&sort=Relevance&contentSegment=ZXAM-MOD1&prod
Deadlines & Guidelines. (n.d.). Retrieved from National Book Foundation:
https://www.nationalbook.org/national-book-awards/submissions/
Grady, C. (2019, October 8). The 2019 National Book Award
finalists spotlight authors from marginalized groups. Retrieved from Vox:
https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/10/8/20904605/2019-national-book-award-finalists-shortlist-nominations
Hedin, B. (2012, November 2). Scandal at the National
Book Awards: Was The Moviegoer’s victory in 1962 a fix? Retrieved from
Slate: https://slate.com/culture/2012/11/1962-national-book-awards-scandal-the-story-behind-the-moviegoer.html
Hoffert, B. (2018, October 15). National Book Awards Lists:
Diverse Voices. Library Journal. Vol. 143 Issue 17, p14-15. 2p., 143(17),
14-15. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohost-com.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=132303182&site=ehost-live
Lipman, E. (2009, April 13). And the Winner Is…Anonymous. Publishers
Weekly, 256(15), 52. Retrieved from
https://search-ebscohost-com.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=39662995&site=ehost-live
Maher, J. (2018, February 5). National Book Award for
Translation Added. Publishers Weekly (Online), 15. Retrieved from
https://search-ebscohost-com.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=127730504&site=ehost-live
Zeitchik, S. (2002, October 28). NBA Costs Pose Hurdles For
Smaller Presses. Publishers Weekly, 249(43), 16. Retrieved from
https://search-ebscohost-com.proxy.ulib.uits.iu.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=7686303&site=ehost-live
This is a great summary of the analysis you did in your paper. You did some very thorough research. I can definitely see how there could be some controversy with National Book Awards. Yet, it is good that you point out the positives of the awards. I was glad to read your last few sentences about there being more diversity now and that Translated Literature is a new category. I have read a couple of translated books and have thought about all the work that has to go into translating it. Some translators definitely deserve some award and recognition.
ReplyDeletecomments noted - the paper's grade can be found on canvas
ReplyDelete